BUFFALO – Way back on opening night, Oct. 5, the Sabres caused KeyBank Center to buzz with excitement for one of the few times in recent memory.
The Sabres’ new regime of coach Phil Housley, a Hall of Fame defenseman and Buffalo legend, and general manager Jason Botterill, who helped construct three Stanley Cup winners in Pittsburgh, had energized the fan base and offered hope.
Perhaps the Sabres wouldn’t make the playoffs in 2017-18, but they were expected to showcase a fast, exciting style while laying the groundwork for future seasons.
The Sabres lost the opener 3-2 to Montreal in a shootout, blowing a third-period lead. Two nights later, the Islanders throttled them 6-3 in New York. On Oct. 9, as New Jersey pummeled the Sabres 6-2 at home, it was clear they would be in for a long season.
The Sabres started 0-4-1 and went 3-7-2 in October, essentially falling out of contention before Halloween. They ended the year fittingly, losing their last four games, part of a 2-9-0 run.
This morning, the Sabres will hold their year-end meetings and close what is widely considered the worst season in franchise history.
The Sabres were downright awful, worthy of their status as the NHL’s worst team.
They earned only 62 points, 16 fewer than last year and the third-lowest full-season total in franchise history. They won just 11 home games, tying the full-season low set in 1971-72. They scored a league-low 198 goals and allowed a whopping 278.
That’s an NHL-worst minus-80 goal differential. No one else was below minus-65. The Sabres also scored a league-low 119 five-on-five goals.
At one point, they went 232:04 – nearly four full games – without scoring a goal.
In trading winger Evander Kane to San Jose on Feb. 26, Botterill said the Sabres had to make changes because “the group that we have right now is not working.”
Saturday’s 4-3 loss in Florida was almost certainly the final appearance in blue and gold for a slew of Sabres.
The Sabres don’t have one glaring weakness. They need help everywhere.
“We got to really evaluate everything that happened this year in all situations,” Housley told reporters in Florida. “I just feel that the one thing when I reflect at this point … is our even-strength scoring and the differential. We got to be a team that’s better defenders, we got to respect that. Our checking has to improve tremendously to give us a chance to win and realizing that OK, hey, it’s OK to win a game 2-1, 3-2.”
Housley is scheduled to talk to reporters today. Botterill, meanwhile, is scheduled to speak Wednesday.
The Sabres sent eight players back to Rochester on Sunday, a massive talent infusion for the playoff-bound Americans. Heading back to the AHL are: forwards Nick Baptiste, Alexander Nylander and Kevin Porter; defensemen Brendan Guhle, Casey Nelson and Matt Tennyson; goalies Linus Ullmark and Adam Wilcox.
In his NHL debut Saturday, Wilcox, 25, stopped all 14 shots he faced after relieving starter Chad Johnson with the Sabres trailing 3-0 after the first period.
“I had to focus up there and kind calm my nerves, because I pretty nervous there,” Wilcox told reporters in Florida.
But Wilcox said he also felt “super happy.”
“I kind of had to (stop) myself from smiling throughout the game,” he said.
After stopping Mike Matheson’s shot during the second period, Wilcox could be seen grinning underneath his mask.
“Adam, what a great kid,” Housley said. “He came in here … he’s got a smile on his face every day.”
Wilcox became the 50th goalie to ever play for the Sabres.
With 19 faceoff wins Saturday, Sabres center Ryan O’Reilly finished with 1,274 this season, breaking the mark of 1,268 Carolina’s Rod Brind’Amour set in 1995-96.
“In sort of a dismal season, there’s something positive that comes out of it,” Housley said.
The NHL has tracked faceoff stats since 1997-98.
When winger Sam Reinhart scored his 25th goal Saturday, it gave the Sabres two 25-goal scorers under 23 years old – center Jack Eichel also hit the mark – for the first time since 1991-92 (Donald Audette and Alexander Mogilny).
2 thoughts on “Last-place Sabres never got on track during lost season”
Housley said after Satudays game that there was to be an “evaluation” done for players on the Sabres team. I think another evaluation should be made for Housley. I suppose if he had more talent on team it may have been a different ending to the season perhaps a playoff berth.
But the reality is Housley was just as miserable at coaching the team as some (most?) of the players were uninterested in winning. My question would be isn’t it the coaches job to coach the players he has and not force players to play a system or style they don’t have the personnel to play ? In other words it’s the coaches job to put players in a position to be successful.
Housley coddled certain players and others he just gave chance after chance while they had no respect or no seriousness to playing at their best all the time. Time after time on the MSG broadcast they’d show players coming down the hallway laughing and joking all happyslapping while losing on the scoreboard and being embarrassed on the ice. It seemed (most) the players where uninterested in winning again that’s on the coach to sense the team was slacking and adjust the situation.
One thing that could have been and should have been done is making Jack Eichel the Sabres captain. My reasoning is simple. Although some fans and media members complain that Jack is “whining” I totally disagree. Jack has something that you can’t teach. You can’t coach or cajole the innate emotion of hating to lose. And there is a big difference between liking to win and hating to lose. It appeared Jack was the only one with a snarl on his face coming off the ice or going back on the ice after losing or being embarrassed as a team.
Ok Mittlestadt, Nylander, Guhle, Nelson all will help Housley’s high octane fast paced system. And if Botterill has a good draft and good off season bringing more fresh players on this team and Housley refuses to change his philosophy on motivating players he might end up on the wrong side of his evaluation.
While I agree with much of your statement, I don’t believe head coaches should have to motivate their players. All NHL players are paid good money with the opportunity to earn even more. They should be motivated to improve and establish a long pro career. The coach does have a responsibility to demand maximum effort and if it’s not there, then they should take appropriate action. Benching , suspending or sending those players down to the AHL. I love Phil Housely, I love his positive attitude and he knows what it takes to be successful. But, I often wondered if he was not being tough enough on his team when it was needed.